Skip to main content
Openlane is an open-source compliance automation platform that helps teams achieve and maintain SOC 2, ISO 27001, and similar attestations. OpenFGA is wired into its data-access layer, so every GraphQL query and mutation is authorized without each resolver having to remember to ask.

​
At a glance

​
Why OpenFGA

Openlane builds the kind of platform whose customers will themselves be audited. Authorization had to be defensible end-to-end — every read, every write, every export — and could not live in a if user.role == "admin" switch sprinkled across resolvers. The team picked OpenFGA so authorization decisions were centralized, modeled as relationships, and could evolve without code changes in every service. A second motivation was packaging: Openlane sells modules, and the same engine that grants access to a record can grant access to a feature. OpenFGA is the source of truth for both.

​
Architecture

  • Authorization as ent middleware. Openlane uses ent hooks to write tuples on every mutation and interceptors plus policies to evaluate every query. Resolvers do not call the OpenFGA SDK directly; the data-access layer does.
  • Object-owned mixin. A reusable ent mixin attaches owner and parent relations to any record type, so cascading permissions (“an editor of the parent program can edit each control”) are declared once and applied uniformly.
  • Overfetch + BatchCheck instead of ListObjects. An early implementation used ListObjects and saw ~8-second worst-case latency for large result sets. The team switched to overfetching candidates from Postgres (capped at 100 per page, up to 1,000 overfetched) and running BatchCheck to filter in a single round trip. Total counts are computed via a separate query that short-circuits when the user is an admin.
  • In-house wrapper packages. Three small Go packages — FGAX (typed helpers around the OpenFGA SDK), entfga (ent hooks that write tuples), and access-map (declarative relation registration) — keep callers honest and make adding a new entity type a few lines of mixin configuration.
  • OpenFGA-as-feature-flags. Module entitlements (“does this tenant have the policy module?”) live in the same OpenFGA store as record-level permissions, so a check that returns false because the user is not an editor and a check that returns false because the tenant did not buy the module use the same call site.

​
Outcomes

  • Authorization can’t be forgotten. Hooks and interceptors mean a new entity type inherits authorization automatically.
  • List-style endpoints went from ~8 s worst case to comfortably under a second at expected page sizes, without changing the public API.
  • One store, two jobs. Record permissions and feature entitlements live in OpenFGA, so packaging changes don’t require a second policy system.
  • Auditable end-to-end. Tuple writes happen in the same transaction boundary as the underlying data mutation, so the access graph and the data it protects don’t drift.

​
Source

This case study is based on a presentation in the OpenFGA community meeting by Sarah Funkhouser, co-founder and head of engineering at Openlane. The Openlane platform itself is open source — the integration patterns above are visible in the theopenlane GitHub organization.
Last modified on September 28, 2026